Premium Economy should be Business Minus not Economy Plus
I read a post on Australian Business Traveller about the new Premium Economy to be introduced on Cathay Pacific. Amongst all the details of pitch and width and recline, and what planes it’s being rolled out on is the following quote from Alex McGowan, Cathay’s General Manager for Product:
“The key with something like premium economy is to understand that it’s an economy plus product, not a ‘business class minus’ product – at least from a philosophical perspective, but not as a product definition”
Content of this Post:
The Problem
The problem, Alex, is that customers don’t see it like that. I suggest that Business Class Minus is very much what passengers want. Business Class – minus the Business Class price. Well, at least what this passenger wants.
On the other hand – I’m realistic. I know that all of that flat bed seat, manchester, service, food and wine is going to cost me more than an economy seat – but I wish that there were compromises that I want rather than what the airline determines. So here is what I would like out of Premium Economy:
- A really comfortable seat
Something like the old business class, plush and sink-into-able, with good armrests and that little space in between seats to rest a cocktail glass - A wide seat
not just a half an inch more but something approaching business class, like 20 or more inches wide - Proper recline
I don’t want 6 or 8 inches. I want more like 12 or 14 – that’s a real recline - Decent pitch
I know space costs money on a plane, but 38 inches is a large waist size, and there is not a great distance between seats. Give me 40 at least – preferably 44. I need to stretch out – not lay down. - Good service
For me, this makes a flight an experience rather than an endurance. It doesn’t have to be the full business experience, but a step up from economy. The kind of service that means you never have to ring to get your wine filled up. - Decent tray table and PowerPoint. I need something to support either my 17-inch notebook or my iPad. I don’t watch that much on the inflight entertainment system these days – for a start, both my computer and iPad have better picture and sound quality, but I do need to be able to recharge both
- A decent amenity kit
and by decent, I mean one with good eye shades, earplugs, toothbrush and paste, and preferably some moisturiser – that’s it. And given Qantas’s First Class amenity pack is valued at $30 – this shouldn’t be impossible
The solution
No I know that is asking too much probably – but here are a couple of things I can do without in the new Business Class minus – Premium Economy
- A flat bed
I would love one (I have loved many) – but I do expect to pay serious money for it - Table service
I love a starched linen tablecloth and silver service – but I can live without it. - Crappy inflight entertainment system
Airlines seem to have concentrated on quantity and not on quality. The screens are crappy, and so are most of the ‘noise cancelling’ headphones. With iPads and computers, I say – save your money on airlines. I’ll bring my own.
So – how much am I prepared to pay for such a service?
Good question. I quickly looked at return fares between Sydney, Australia and London, UK, departing mid-February 2012 and returning 4 weeks later. Here are the broad price ranges – using whatever is the cheapest through to the average Qantas or British Airways fare:
- Economy = AU$1,600 to 1,800
- Premium = AU 4,000 to 5,000
- Business = 5,700 to 9,300 (with a lot in the mid-price range of AU$7,000 to 8,000)
In broad comparison, Premium Economy is about 2.5 times as expensive as Economy, and Business is about 3.5 to 5 times the cost of Economy. Those multiples are about right, but I don’t think the service corresponds to value for money. If Premium Economy was going to cost me $4,000 on JAL, but I could get a lie-flat bed on Asiana for $5,673, I would be paying the extra for the superb service with Asiana and the lie-flat bed, even though I would need to spend a night at Incheon on the way over.
2PAXfly Takeout
So, what’s the takeaway for airlines on this? You need to lift the Premium Economy game so that the service and seats feel more like Business minus the lie-flat seats while keeping the price point about the same as it currently is. For me and those like me – who have reached an age where Economy Class is almost unthinkable for the long haul, and business class is just too expensive, unless heavily discounted, we are prepared to pay the extra for a good Premium Economy experience rather than just Economy with a few inches more leg room.
Originally published in December 2011. Updated 4 January 2024
It’s called Economy for a reason. Ick.
Thanks Gene. ‘Ick’ indeed.
I just popped over and read you bio…you are my kind of blogger! 🙂
Thanks for the compliment.
As always not everyone wants the same thing. While you want “business-lite” others may be willing to pay less for “economy-plus” so it’s definitely hard for airlines to figure out what balance to provide at what price point to maximise their revenues and customer satisfaction.
Thanks for the comment, Roger. It’s a good insight. My argument is that most airlines have gone for Economy Plus, rather than service the Business Lite market.